Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Michael J. Field 1 Article
Medical school accreditation in Australia: Issues involved in assessing major changes and new programs
Michael J. Field
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2011;8:6.   Published online June 8, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2011.8.6
  • 28,100 View
  • 177 Download
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The Australian Medical Council (AMC) is an independent company for quality assurance and quality improvement in medical education in Australia and New Zealand. Accreditation procedures for the 20 medical schools in these two countries are somewhat different for three different circumstances or stages of school development: existing medical schools, established courses undergoing major changes, and new schools. This paper will outline some issues involved in major changes to existing courses, and new medical school programs. Major changes have included change from a 6 year undergraduate course to a 5 year undergraduate course or 4 year graduate-entry course, introduction of a lateral graduate-entry stream, new domestic site of course delivery, offshore course delivery, joint program between two universities, and major change to curriculum. In the case of a major change assessment, accreditation of the new or revised course may be granted for a period up to two years after the full course has been implemented. In the assessment of proposals for introduction of new medical courses, six issues needing careful consideration have arisen: forward planning, academic staffing, adequate clinical experience, acceptable research program, adequacy of resources, postgraduate training program and employment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reference to nutrition in medical accreditation and curriculum guidance: a comparative analysis
    Breanna Lepre, Kylie J Mansfield, Sumantra Ray, Eleanor Beck
    BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health.2021; 4(1): 307.     CrossRef
  • Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
    Hanna Jung, Woo Taek Jeon, Shinki An
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 31.     CrossRef
  • Is the Accreditation in Medical Education an Opportunity or a Burden?
    Hanna Jung, Woo Taek Jeon, Shinki An
    Korean Medical Education Review.2020; 22(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Describing the Evidence Base for Accreditation in Undergraduate Medical Education Internationally: A Scoping Review
    Sean Tackett, Christiana Zhang, Najlla Nassery, Christine Caufield-Noll, Marta van Zanten
    Academic Medicine.2019; 94(12): 1995.     CrossRef
  • Curricular Content Level of Complexity Is a Factor of Depression and Learning in Medical Students
    Rosalinda Guevara Guzmán, María Esther Urrutia-Aguilar
    Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science.2015; 05(07): 274.     CrossRef
  • Can a medical regulatory system be implemented in Korea?
    Sun Huh, Myung-Hyun Chung
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2013; 56(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • Introducing integrated laboratory classes in a PBL curriculum: impact on student’s learning and satisfaction
    Samy A Azer, Rana Hasanato, Sami Al-Nassar, Ali Somily, Muslim M AlSaadi
    BMC Medical Education.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The place of surface anatomy in the medical literature and undergraduate anatomy textbooks
    Samy A. Azer
    Anatomical Sciences Education.2013; 6(6): 415.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions